Circumstances, significance and Repercussions of the speech:
Every
year on October 26 (Aban 4) - the day, which marks the birthday of the Iranian
dictator - ceremonies which cost millions of tumans to organise, and which
received wide and spectacular publicity, would be held in government offices
and organisations. In the cities, boroughs and villages members of the police
and the gendarmerie would force merchants and shopkeepers to hang both a
picture of the Shah and the national flag over their shop entrances. On October
26 of 1978 however (Aban 4, 1357 AHS), there was no sign of these practices
being observed. Instead, this particular day saw a great number of the youth in
Tehran donning black clothes as part of a co-ordinated plan to express the loathing
and aversion they felt towards the Shah’s regime. Again, dressed in black and
carrying bunches of flowers, political prisoners who had recently been released
from prison went to Bihisht-i Zahra cemetery to visit the graves of those
martyred In the revolution, and to pay homage to the blood they had shed;
whilst certain employees of the Radio and Television Broadcasting Company also
turned up for work on that day dressed in black clothing.
Also
on this day, Brigadier General Nadva - the military governor of) ahrum, who had
behaved with extreme ruthlessness in this city from day one
Of
martial law being Implemented - and Colonel Tasa’udi - the Chief of Police, who
had frequently ordered his troops to open fire on demonstrators - are both shot
and killed by a brave, revolutionary soldier on duty by the name of Hasan
Kherad-Asadi, following which the executor of this courageous act is
unfortunately arrested.
Meanwhile,
journalists report a number of people killed and others wounded during mass
demonstrations in Dezful and Eqlid-I Fars; and in Zanjan, a bloody
demonstration takes place and most of the city’s banks, government-affiliated
organisations, and centres of corruption are set on fire, no report being
forthcoming as to the number of those killed or wounded during this event.
October
26, 1978 (Aban 4, 1 357 AHS) also witnesses the staging of a demonstration and
protest march by the students of Tehran University. Here, martial law officers
open fire on the students, some of whom are hit and wounded and are then taken
to hospital by fellow students.
In
Isfahan meanwhile, Major General Nail, the city’s military governor, gives an
early command for his troops to shoot and as a result, a great number of the
Muslim people in Isfahan are left writhing in the agony wrought on the streets
there. As on other occasions, the actual number of people killed during this
event is never revealed. However, the city’s hospitals make a constant plea for
blood donations, and journalists’ reports claim this demonstration in Isfahan
to be the most bloody to have taken place since the enforcement of martial law.
Massive
demonstrations held by the people in Mashhad, Qum, Abadeh, Gurgan, Riza’iyeh
(Urumiyeh), West Shahabad (Islamabad), Bihbihan, Yazd, Iylam, Rudsar,
Miyandowab and Firuzabad-I Fars all end when clashes break out between
demonstrators and the Shah’s hirelings, leaving a number of people dead and
others injured in each of the said cities.
This
day, October 26, 1978, also sees the release of a number of political prisoners,
who, on their release, receive a tumultuous reception from the people of Tehran
- people who are aware of the truth of the matter. Garlands of flowers are hung
around the freed prisoners’ necks - prisoners who were now returning. To their
families after having endured years of torture by the SAVAK agents in prison.
In
various parts of Tehran, huge demonstrations are now in full swing and
journalists’ reports tell of martial law officers firing at the demonstrators
whereby six people are killed and those wounded are taken to several different
hospitals for treatment. In order to help the injured, people with motorbikes
now ride around the city of Tehran appealing for blood to be donated, and as a
result, those who wish to give blood form long queues outside each and every
hospital, refusing to go away and leave the queues despite being threatened by
disciplinary officers.In
the wake of the uprising of Khurdad 1 5 (June 5), Qum was a city which had
witnessed demonstrations and clashes on a daily basis as from January 7, 1978
(Dey 17, 1356 AHS), but now, on October 26, 1978 (Aban 4, 1357 AHS), even this
city has assumed a particularly striking appearance for only very few people
are not wearing black clothing and black flags are hanging above the entrances
to shops and even homes. The idea of wearing black had been spread via
leaflets, which had been prepared, by a group of militant clergymen. These
leaflets had then been distributed in Tehran and the provinces and had been
popularly received by the people there. News of this move is now relayed to the
world’s major news agencies by reporters who describe it as an “unprecedented
event.” Meanwhile, protest marches and rallies are in evidence throughout the
cities and villages of Iran including the capital, Tehran, and cries of “Death
to the Shah” and ‘~Long live Khomeini” ring out in all parts of the country.
A ceremony hailing October 26 is held in the Shah’s presence, and Ja’ far Sharif
Imami, the Prime Minister, announces: “This year, October 26 coincides with the
full implementation of the policy to allow freedom of thought and speech.”(!)
Similarly, during an address given at the ceremony in which various issues are
discussed, the Shah states: “Certain mistakes have inevitably been made. A
number of sound programmes have inevitably strayed from their intended path,
and organisation has been lacking in certain affairs. But this is nevertheless
something which can be corrected and remedied.” He then adds: “Certain mistakes
have been made in the past, but the country must continue to survive. We firmly
believe in freedom and support an open political climate; and indeed, freedom
must prevail. As can be seen, the press now writes whatever it likes.” The Shah
then admits to thousands of people being held in prisons, and says: “Thousands
of those who were held in prisons have been released. We have already released
and shall continue to release such prisoners whenever this is possible, and
this open social climate will become Increasingly apparent to you as the days
pass by.”(269)
The
USA still hopes to keep the Shah in power by whatever means necessary, hence,
in a message sent to the Shah to mark October 26, Carter expresses himself
thus: “The present difficulties will blow over and thanks to the progressive
political policy which His Royal Highness has had Implemented, the nation of
Iran will arise as a powerful nation. Your Royal Highness, allow me to stress
once more that the USA greatly values the firm and long-standing relationship
it enjoys with Iran.”(
270)
Waiter
Scheel, the West German President, and Hua Kuo-feng, the Chinese leader, also
send congratulatory messages to the Shah on his birthday. Here, the reader
needs to be reminded that Hua Kuo-feng is the very person who came to Tehran as
an official guest of the Shah on September 8, 1978 (Shahrivar 1 7, 1 357 AHS),
a day when thousands of people attained martyrdom at the hands of the regime’s
agents both in Tehran and in the provinces. Needless to say, later, following
the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Mr. Hua Kuo-feng sent a message to the
government of the Islamic Republic In which he made an official apology for
having visited Tehran and having been a guest of the Shah during those sombre
and traumatic days!
As
well as Carter and Hua Kuo-feng, others who also sent congratulatory messages
to the Shah included Leonid Brezhnev, the USSR’s Head of State, and the leaders
and presidents of Canada, Morocco, Malta, Syria, Indonesia, Holland,
Bangladesh, Guinea, North Korea, South Africa, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Senegal,
Bulgaria, Mauritius, West Germany, Tunisia, Oman, Vietnam, Albania, France, and
several other countries. There can be no doubt that these declarations of
support for the Shah served to delay the latter’s departure from Iran and to
prolong the killings which he brought about In the country.
In
a major speech delivered on October 26, 1978 by Imam Khomeini (may God grant
him peace) from his place of residence in Neauphle-Ie-Chateau before an
audience of students and Iranians resident abroad, reference is made to the
Shah’s crimes, to the regime’s anti-Islamic propaganda campaigns,
and to the tragic attack on the Friday
Mosque in Kerman by mercenaries. In this speech, Imam also urges everyone,
irrespective of their social class, to unite as one in order to continue in
their struggle against the regime; and in declaring October 26 (the Shah’s
birthday) a day of mourning, he stresses: “October 26 is a day of national
mourning, and is the day from whence all of the miseries suffered by the
oppressed nation of Iran initially sprung. The noble and oppressed people of
Iran, and those fronts which have a love of Islam and the country, are to
divest the enemy of their ability tothink
straight, and must bring an end to their tyrannical rule as soon as possible.
SPEECH NUMBERFORTY-SIX
|
IN THE NAME OF GOD, THE COMPASSIONATE, THE MERCIFUL
Today,
on October 26 (Aban 4)(
271)
, even
Iran’s own radio service has spoken of demonstrations and disturbances taking
place in many of the cities in iran; and according to reports, people in Qum,
northern Tehran and certain other places have dressed in black clothing, black
banners also being in evidence in some places(
272)
There are different kinds
of birthdays: one kind of birthday is something from which goodness springs, it
is a source of blessings, it is something which leads to the oppressor being
crushed and to the idol- and fire temples being destroyed. This is the kind of
birthday, which pertains to the Holy Prophet. It has been said that the fire in
the temple at Pars was extinguished and that the columns of Taq-i Kisra tumbled
to the ground. History has spoken of this demolition and extirpation(
273)
, but
the point to bear in mind is that at that time two powerful forces were in
existence:
One
of them comprising the oppressive rulers of the day, and the other, the
fire-worshipping clerical authorities, and because of the birth of the Holy
Prophet, because he had been brought into this world, these two forces were
eventually destroyed. The awe-inspiring columns of Taq-i Kisra, which served as
a visible sign of these powerful forces, came tumbling down.
“Anushirvan
the Just(
274)
” of whom some speak, is nothing but a myth! He was in fact a
cruel tyrant of a man, but maybe he was called “just” in comparison to other
kings, for otherwise how could he possibly b~ called “Anushirvan the Just?” It
was because the Holy Prophet was born into this world that these columns of
oppression collapsed. That is, the roots of oppression were eradicated and the
flames of dualism, polytheism and fire-worship were extinguished because the
Prophet came into the world
The
foundations of both of the powerful forces, which prevailed at that time, were
destroyed because of him. The following two basic principles then became
widespread: via the Holy Prophet, monotheism grew worldwide, and, God willing,
still continues to grow; and the essential purpose of prophethood was actually
realised, for the real purpose of prophet hood is a prophet’s mission to wipe
out the roots of power held by those in authority who treat the people
unfairly.
Thus,
the Prophet had come to wipe out these roots of oppression, to destroy these
columns of oppression, which were so impressive, these palace columns which
were erected through the hard toil of these poor people, through the torment
suffered by these poor people, through the exploitation of these poor powerless
people. And at the same time, since that which really matters is the spread of
monotheism, the Prophet destroyed those places from where fire and beings other
than God were worshipped, and he extinguished the fires therein.
However,
quite the opposite results from the births of certain other people, and October
26 is a case in point. Of course, I must beg the Holy Prophet’s forgiveness for
mentioning his birthday in conjunction with that of this despicable wretch (the
Shah), but it is a case of wanting to compare light to darkness, of comparing a
true human being to one who is inhuman. And it is this inauspicious birthday
(of the Shah), which has led to the present state of affairs of which you are
all aware. These two affairs concerning the signs of polytheism and oppression
constituted the reason for the Holy Prophet’s coming and indeed both of these
signs were eventually wiped out by him, but the situation with regard to them
both was reversed with the birth of this person! That is to say, the birth of
this person has led to a situation where both fire worshippers and the worship
of fire have gained strength and have been promoted, and where the roots of
oppression have become increasingly firm. And this is especially the case in
our own country of Iran.
One
side of the story in Iran concerns the fire worshippers who live in and around
Yard, and who have been given so much encouragement and support(
275)
, that
according to the newspapers, these American fire Worshippers
even wrote to the Shah thanking him and stating that no one else had hitherto
supported and honored their faith to the extent that he had. It was God’s will
that our people soon awoke. Even though they awoke after the event, they
nevertheless awoke in time and were thus able to prevent this person from
following his plans through. The American fire worshippers and the wealthy
among them had intended to impose their will upon him (the Shah), or perhaps it
was also a case of him being found willing, but whatever, there was more to
this affair than that which I have mentioned. There was much more involved than
the issues I have pointed to and indeed these issues were of a more delicate
nature.
It
all began when he helped to promote some of the fire temples and changed the
calendar whereby time was reckoned according to Zoroastrian history rather than
that of Islam. God knows that this act of betrayal by him towards Islam, and
this affront to the Holy Prophet, God’s peace and blessings be upon him and his
descendants, constitutes a crime of much more serious proportions than that of
these killings which he has brought about. If we were to balance all these
killings against this one deed which involved changing the official calendar of
Islam, changing the symbol of monotheism, the symbol of humanity, into these
things which relate to fire worshippers, into a fire worshippers’ calendar, a
calendar for the Zoroastrians, then we would see that this crime outweighs all
of the other crimes that he has committed against us. This person wanted to
ruin Islam’s reputation and worth; he wanted to destroy the symbol of Islam.
He
has sent our oil to them, taking it and giving it away to them. And yet these
are things which matter in material terms only but which nevertheless clearly
constitute a crime. Giving a country’s reserves away to foreigners constitutes
a crime against a nation, but changing the calendar constitutes an affront to
the reputation of Islam. And this is exactly what this person has done. Indeed,
if it weren’t for that punch which the nation gave him in the mouth thus
compelling him to bring back Islamic calendar and dispose with the Zoroastrian
calendar, then this affair would have developed even further. Basically, they
had intended to return things to the way they were before the Holy Prophet of
Islam, to the time of those tyrannical kings, those vicious murderers, and they
had intentions of behaving as the latter had done and of bringing about the
same state of affairs that had existed at the time of these kings.
“Pan
Iranianism(
276)
” is the belief that Iran must preserve its Iranian identity!
But do the ancient kings mean everything to you? Are the ancient kings all that
you can claim to have had in the past? Just look at what these kings did to the
people. And the same goes for that group which comprised the Magi and others
like them, just look at how they treated the people of Iran(
277)
.
As
for the other side of the story, this concerns how the Holy Prophet behaved
towards his own people when he came and called on them to believe in
monotheism, and even how he behaved towards those infidels who paid tribute to
the Islamic state, those people who were against religion. Hazrat Amir (Imam ‘Ali),
peace and blessings be upon him, once said that he had heard of an army of
soldiers - apparently they had been Mu’ awiya’ s soldiers - arriving at a
certain place and of them stealing, amongst other things, an anklet from the
foot of a non-Muslim (dhimmi), from the foot of a woman who was either Jewish
or Christian. Accounts describe how Hazrat Amir then said: “Even if one died of
grief because of this incident, this would not be an overreaction(
278)
.
This
is the kind of person he was. This is the kind of ruler we seek. We seek the
kind of regime whose ruler, whose king - indeed, it is impertinent of me to
call Hazrat Amir “king” - whose ruler, whose leader, is like he who governed
over a range of countries including the Hijaz, Iran, Egypt and so on; like he
who showed concern for all of his subjects, including the person who was not of
his own faith. On the very day that they swore allegiance to Hazrat Amir,
accepting him as their sultan as it were, as their imam and caliph, once homage
had been paid to him, he took up his pick and went to work, for he was someone
who used to get things done himself, through his own toil. But why should he
have done this - why did he dig the soil? Once he had in fact dug a well,
someone came to him to congratulate him after which he replied: “It is the
succeeding generations that you should congratulate.” He then asked that the
indigent be brought to him and he endowed the place in question to them(
279)
.
Yes,
we seek a ruler like Hazrat Amir, who would sit and reckon the accounts of the
public treasury in the light emitted from one lamp, from one paraffin lamp or
oil lamp or whatever kind of lamp they used at that time. In fact, on one
occasion Hazrat Amir was busy making such calculations when somebody called on
him to discuss something which bore no relation to the work in which the hazrat
was engaged at that moment. Imam ‘all therefore turned out the light saying:
“Until this moment I was reckoning the accounts of the public treasury. This
light is public property and I was using it to enable me to do work which
relates to the people’s property, but now that you wish to speak to me about
something else, something which bears no relation to the public treasury, why
should we continue to use the people’s lamp(
280)
? Of course, no one can behave
as Hazrat Amir did, no one in the world is capable of this, but the least we
ask is that our ruler be someone who is not a thief! Now we have reached the
stage where we will be content to have a ruler who at least does not steal to
such an extent, a ruler who will not plunder the wealth of these people so, or
oppress them in this way.
As
I previously explained, the birth of the Most Noble Messenger, peace and
blessings be upon him, led to the fires in the fire temples being extinguished,
but on the contrary, besides his (the Shah’s) intention to relight the fires in
such temples - fire temples which had once given occasion to oppression -
according to what they say, he has actually given his approval and support to
some of the fire temples which are located around Yazd. Furthermore, he changed
the calendar and he had intended to continue with this line of action, putting
such plans into effect one by one, that is, of course, until the nation came to
the rescue and caused the columns of Kisra’ s Palace to tumble to the ground,
although true enough, oppression is yet to be put down in this way.
Do
you now see what he did to this nation? Do you see how he has oppressed and
continues to oppress this nation? Yet, even at this late hour, now that his
number is up and his efforts are in vain, he has come up with certain ideas!
From what they say, the regime has sent a certain group of people to Kerman,
people who are supposedly kolis, people whom they call “vagrants” - now whether
the regime paid these people to go there or not I Do not know - but it is
similar to what happened in the year when Fayziya Madrasa was stormed.
On
that occasion I was present, I was in Qum when those SAVAK agents and those
commandos posing as “peasants” charged into Fayziya Madrasa, setting fire to
the Qur’an, setting fire to turbans, flinging people to their deaths from the
roof. And all this was supposedly done because
The
peasants no longer favoured the akhund’(
281)
! It was claimed that these
peasants no longer desired to follow the Qur’ an, that they did not want the
akhund! But is this really the case? Whenever the peasant is questioned as to
what he desires, he replies that he desires both the Qur’an and Islam. Those
commandos and the others who you (the Shah) trained in order to crush Islam,
are they really our peasants? Yes indeed, I was present to witness events and
to see what they (the regime) did on that occasion. They even came to my home
at that time, but the harsh reaction I showed towards them prevented them from
fulfilling their intentions.
The
whole incident at Fayziya began during a gathering there. Certain speakers
wished to speak at this gathering, and I had either already spoken or was due
to speak when someone told me, and indeed I myself witnessed, that an uncalled
for salawat had been chanted. I then instructed a friend to announce that
should anyone attempt to cause trouble at the gathering, then I would ascend
the pulpit in the courtyard of the holy shrine of Hazrat Ma’suma (pbuh) and
would speak out to the people there. Those agents present were not the sort of
people to persist with such behaviour knowing that it would bring about such
consequences; and since they were at a loss as to what they should do, they
left the gathering(
282)
.
It
was on that same day that they poured into Fayziya Madrasa and went wild; it
was on that very same afternoon that they committed those outrages in Fayziya
Madrasa(
283)
On that particular day, it was in the guise of peasants that
they ran riot and behaved so disgracefully, and now they have started to claim
that it is the kolis who are doing whatever. The(
284)
regime’s agents poured
into the city of Kerman in the guise of kolis, and they have done the same
elsewhere, in other cities, cities such as Hamadan where the people were so
savagely attacked. It is said that the same has also happened in Zanjan. As for
Qum, disturbances, shootings and killings have been going on for the past two
or three days now, and the city has been in a state of unrest as have some parts
of Tehran. Even today, I listened to a number of reports broadcast over Iranian
radio, which named many different places where there is unrest and so on.
And
so there we have the people’s celebration for October 26, the 4ay which
commemorates his birthday! Black is being worn today. Yes, the radio mentioned
one or two places - I think it was Maragheh or somewhere - where this and that
had happened, and then the radio continued to give some account or other of
events there. As for who did what, I Do not know how valid their accounts are
or who was actually involved in these events, but having said that, the fact
remains that many cities have been quoted over the radio even though the truth
is without doubt something other than that which they have been reporting.
There is certainly more to it than this, and news of what actually occurred
during these events will no doubt reach you later.
Whilst
two important events came to pass because of the Most Noble Messenger’s birth,
those being: the end brought to polytheistic and fire-worshipping tendencies,
and the collapse of the columns of oppression, now his (the Shah’s) birth has
in fact served to rekindle fire-worshipping! If he had been given the chance he
would have revived the principles of fire worshipping, for we already saw how
he had changed the calendar, and had erected those towers of besetting
oppression.
It
is such towers of oppression, which give rise to these holocausts of fire. What
exactly had those poor people who had gone to the cinema(
285)
done to warrant
the Chief of Police going and closing the doors (whilst the cinema was ablaze)
and refusing to allow the people to open them? Of course it must be said that
the cinema in Iran is not really a place which one should frequent This is one
of the tragedies in Iran that the cinema’s there serve to corrupt and ruin our
youth In spite of this tact certain, people had indeed gone to the cinema on
this occasion but even so why should they have been treated in this way”
Evidently certain incendiary devices had been planted there with the intention
of creating a tire of burning those poor people alive, of turning them into
ashes And the whole purpose was to make others out to be terrorists~ Surely
though there was no need to go so far as to commit such a terrorist act
yourselves and then to place the blame on other supposed terrorists But then
these are the kind of people they are This is the kind of regime the Iranian
people have to put up with They (the regime) committed that shameful act in
Kerman, storming the mosque there suffocating a group of those present by means
of certain gases, killing another group comprising men and women adults and
children setting fire to everything in the mosque, in the people s place of
worship, and then they invaded the bazaar looting it and setting it ablaze Yet
now after all that they say that they intend to send some people to discover
who actually committed such a deed! But who does he intend to send to make
enquiries? Does he mean to send the same people that he sent to discover who
had caused the incident in Abadan (i.e. the Rex Cinema tragedy)? Does “His
Imperial Majesty” wish to punish the ruthless brutes who committed this act? He
himself is that person! It is he who is the source of all the tyranny and
misery suffered by the people.
If
the people of Iran do not make a move and put an end to this soon, then there
are many things, which he intends to do. This nation must be rescued. Everyone,
wherever they may be, must help these people; otherwise, this man will destroy
the very fabric of society. Now, having behaved so disgracefully in Kerman and
having laid the blame on the kolis or whoever - no one being more of a koli
than he (the Shah) himself - yes, now he has sent people to conduct a so-called
public enquiry into who carried out such an act, who committed such an
atrocious deed! But sir, the nation can no longer believe these things that you
say.
From
the very beginning of events in Abadan, the people of that city took to the
streets of their own volition for they realised that they (the regime) were the
ones who were responsible for this crime. They realised
Wanted
to carry out this deed in such a smooth manner, if he had wanted to create a
fire with such skill, to plant incendiary substances so effectively and then to
close the cinema doors thus preventing anyone from leaving the cinema . . .
there is no way that he could have achieved this. And this is why people began
to make their voices heard (in protest), and why now, whenever such incidents
occur, the people themselves are aware of who is to blame.
style='margin-left:9.0pt;tab-stops:405.0pt'>Again, anti-regime protests were widely held when the
people went to visit the cemetery(
286)
And this is how things now are in
Kerman; how they are in Hamadan; how they are in Zanjan. Now he (the Shah) has
recently made the decision to silence the people in this way. The people all
know that these acts of oppression are all performed on his orders. There is no
way that a member of the police would set people on fire unless he had been
given leave to do so by him (the Shah). Do you really think they would dare to
kill someone without his permission? - Without his instructions, without his
strict instructions?
On
Khurdad 15 (June 5), he himself was in command. From what they say he commanded
the forces himself(
287)
He who is in command in all of these different places
is this very man. This man’s birth has been the source of all the sufferings of
the people of Iran. May God remove this source of oppression (the audience
cries Amen), may He cast this black flag to the ground (the audience cries
Amen); and soon so, He shall, God willing. This is something, which is about to
take place. This kind of frantic action that we now see is that of an animal
whose head has been severed and who now wants to make a last desperate
struggle.
Be
that as it may, we are all duty-bound, all of us. Those of us here all have a
duty to perform. Each one of you, if possible, must pass on written material
about Iran to the newspapers here, to the journals here, to your fellow
students and to the universities here. Pass on information about the situation
in Iran. Tell the people about Iran. Even now, there may still be certain
people who are not aware of what is really going on.
Is
America right in saying that the people are upset because they have been given
freedom, because they have been given too much freedom too quickly(
288)
? Have
the Iranian people got indigestion because of the freedom that has been given
to them? Has the nation raised its voice because it has been given too much freedom?
Indeed, this is how Mr. Carter sees it! And the newspapers - either Kayhan or
Ittila ‘at - have quoted him as saying that a quick democracy has been brought
about, a sudden new-found freedom has been given, and that this is why the
people are now opposing him (the Shah)! Is this really the case? Is it that he
has granted freedom, and because of this the people still cry out: “We want
freedom, we want freedom?” Are they crying out because of the independence and
the “great civilisation” that they enjoy?
Again
only today, this man (the Shah) was talking about how everyone could see for
themselves how much freedom there is in Iran; how everyone could see the
freedom, he had granted to this nation. Only today, October 26, did he say
these things’(
289)
I really can’t figure out what makes these people tick! I
am astonished! God knows there is indeed call to be astonished, firstly, at the
kind of people they are . . . and secondly, at the fear that has arisen amongst
the Muslim people that, as the Shah puts it: “If it weren’t for me the
communists would take over.(
290)
” The world would in fact come to an end!
Without him (the Shah) there is no Iran! Indeed, Iran is Muhammad Riza! Without
him, Iran would no longer exist! Thus, he argues that we Iranians wish to live
in our own country, we wish to resolve our differences or whatever in our own
country; but he says that if he were not there then there would no longer be an
Iran!
Those
young people who shout slogans such as these(
291)
, slogans which are false and
groundless, those people are presently assisting the regime. On the one hand
they are assisting it by trying to make a group of people afraid of a possible
communist takeover should the Shah leave -although in fact these kinds of
remarks no longer frighten the people - and on the other hand, these very
differences of opinion which exist between us and between the young people
themselves, this dichotomy which is to be found amongst the young people,
serves to assist this regime whereby those of you who are under the impression
that you are helping to bring the Shah down, are in fact, paradoxically
strengthening the bases of his oppression.
I
regret the fact that these youngsters are assisting the regime in this way
without even being aware of what they are doing. Those who ask you to chant
these slogans are those who are actually allied to this very regime. These
communists who belong to the officially recognised Tudeh Party, these leading
communist figures, in actual fact serve his (the Shah’s) ~: regime(
292)
and
our children, our youngsters, will have been taken in if they go along with
their game. The light of Islam still lies within these : youngsters but they
have been deceived. They ought to break away from these criminals, from those
who urge them to join their outfit. These people in fact want to save the Shah
and you are unaware of this. It makes no difference whether they are inside the
country or abroad.
Propaganda
is being disseminated under various pretexts in order to save this person (the
Shah). Whatever means possible are being resorted to so that this person can
remain, and this affair (concerning the supposed threat of communism) is one
such means. Wake up. These youngsters of ours are to pay close attention to
what is currently going on for events, which are now unfolding are crucial. If
what they say is true and one and a half thousand students have staged a
pro-communist demonstration, then this itself is a sign of the defeat of
communism in Iran. The very fact that a mere one and a half thousand people are
standing in confrontation against a population of thirty million, all of whom
have risen the banner (of Islam) and are crying out for the Qur’ an, is itself
proof that these (communists) have suffered a defeat in Iran.
Hence,
it is not the case that the communists would take over should he (the Shah)
leave. If he should leave, not even a single communist would be found in Iran,
for even if we suppose that instead of one and a half thousand people, five
thousand people are now standing in confrontation against the rest of the
population, these youngsters of ours in Qum alone could easily deal with them.
There would be no need for those in Tehran to assist in any way, for our
youngsters in Qum alone could put paid to these communists. What on earth are
the communists capable of doing? They have tricked you. Everything that they
say is mere rhetoric. They wish to use you to the Shah’s advantage. They have
now exploited you; they have made fools of you.
Do
not listen to what they have to say. Unite and cry out with one voice. Join the
Muslims in their cries. If you were to cry out in unison, then it would be all
over for him (the Shah). Do not sow discord. A house divided against itself
cannot stand. Today, the presence of differences means suicide for the Muslims.
Everyone must unite. Everyone must cry out in unison. Everyone must cry out for
the same thing, they must all cry: “Death to this Shah and to this monarchy;
death. To those who support him, such as Carter and others like him.” This is
what we are crying out and this is what will make the people succeed. Do not be
afraid of these things that they say and all this commotion that they make. Can
a nation, which has risen up to make a legitimate claim, carry on living under
oppression?
We
all saw for ourselves how the martial law governments were unable to do
anything about the situation. In Qum for example, isn’t martial law still in
force there? Yet, for the past three or four days now, anti-regime slogans have
rung out in the city. Clashes have broken out there. Unrest prevails. And what
about the situation in Tehran, is that any different? No indeed, the situation
there is the same as in Qum.
I
beseech God, the Blessed and Exalted, to grant good health to all of those
brethren both inside the country and abroad, who are making sacrifices for the
sake of Islam. May the Lord grant you all success? May He grant you all good
health? Everyone must make an effort to assist this nation, which has now risen
up and is shedding its blood. Everyone must cooperate with this nation so that,
God willing, it may succeed. Right now, in order for you who are abroad to
cooperate, you must propagate the nation’s message. The people there in Iran
are having to deal with commandos and those so-called “kolis” - who are in fact
commandos also -and they are presently having to shed their blood, whereas
those of you who are here, abroad, must help your fellow countryman in whatever
way possible by means of propagation (those present chant a salawat).
|