GHadeer.org _ kauthar 2

INTRODUCTION TO SPEECH NUMBER
FORTY-SIX

Date: October 26, 1978 (AD) I Aban 4, 1357 (AHS) I Dhu al-Qa’dah 23, 1398 (AH)
Place: Neauphle-le-Chateau, Paris, France
Theme: The prime culprit behind all of the crimes in Iran is the Shah himself
Occasion: The Shah’s birthday
Those present: A group of students and Iranians residing abroad

Circumstances, significance and Repercussions of the speech:

    Every year on October 26 (Aban 4) - the day, which marks the birthday of the Iranian dictator - ceremonies which cost millions of tumans to organise, and which received wide and spectacular publicity, would be held in government offices and organisations. In the cities, boroughs and villages members of the police and the gendarmerie would force merchants and shopkeepers to hang both a picture of the Shah and the national flag over their shop entrances. On October 26 of 1978 however (Aban 4, 1357 AHS), there was no sign of these practices being observed. Instead, this particular day saw a great number of the youth in Tehran donning black clothes as part of a co-ordinated plan to express the loathing and aversion they felt towards the Shah’s regime. Again, dressed in black and carrying bunches of flowers, political prisoners who had recently been released from prison went to Bihisht-i Zahra cemetery to visit the graves of those martyred In the revolution, and to pay homage to the blood they had shed; whilst certain employees of the Radio and Television Broadcasting Company also turned up for work on that day dressed in black clothing.

Also on this day, Brigadier General Nadva - the military governor of) ahrum, who had behaved with extreme ruthlessness in this city from day one

Of martial law being Implemented - and Colonel Tasa’udi - the Chief of Police, who had frequently ordered his troops to open fire on demonstrators - are both shot and killed by a brave, revolutionary soldier on duty by the name of Hasan Kherad-Asadi, following which the executor of this courageous act is unfortunately arrested.

Meanwhile, journalists report a number of people killed and others wounded during mass demonstrations in Dezful and Eqlid-I Fars; and in Zanjan, a bloody demonstration takes place and most of the city’s banks, government-affiliated organisations, and centres of corruption are set on fire, no report being forthcoming as to the number of those killed or wounded during this event.

October 26, 1978 (Aban 4, 1 357 AHS) also witnesses the staging of a demonstration and protest march by the students of Tehran University. Here, martial law officers open fire on the students, some of whom are hit and wounded and are then taken to hospital by fellow students.

In Isfahan meanwhile, Major General Nail, the city’s military governor, gives an early command for his troops to shoot and as a result, a great number of the Muslim people in Isfahan are left writhing in the agony wrought on the streets there. As on other occasions, the actual number of people killed during this event is never revealed. However, the city’s hospitals make a constant plea for blood donations, and journalists’ reports claim this demonstration in Isfahan to be the most bloody to have taken place since the enforcement of martial law.

Massive demonstrations held by the people in Mashhad, Qum, Abadeh, Gurgan, Riza’iyeh (Urumiyeh), West Shahabad (Islamabad), Bihbihan, Yazd, Iylam, Rudsar, Miyandowab and Firuzabad-I Fars all end when clashes break out between demonstrators and the Shah’s hirelings, leaving a number of people dead and others injured in each of the said cities. This day, October 26, 1978, also sees the release of a number of political prisoners, who, on their release, receive a tumultuous reception from the people of Tehran - people who are aware of the truth of the matter. Garlands of flowers are hung around the freed prisoners’ necks - prisoners who were now returning. To their families after having endured years of torture by the SAVAK agents in prison.

In various parts of Tehran, huge demonstrations are now in full swing and journalists’ reports tell of martial law officers firing at the demonstrators whereby six people are killed and those wounded are taken to several different hospitals for treatment. In order to help the injured, people with motorbikes now ride around the city of Tehran appealing for blood to be donated, and as a result, those who wish to give blood form long queues outside each and every hospital, refusing to go away and leave the queues despite being threatened by disciplinary officers.In the wake of the uprising of Khurdad 1 5 (June 5), Qum was a city which had witnessed demonstrations and clashes on a daily basis as from January 7, 1978 (Dey 17, 1356 AHS), but now, on October 26, 1978 (Aban 4, 1357 AHS), even this city has assumed a particularly striking appearance for only very few people are not wearing black clothing and black flags are hanging above the entrances to shops and even homes. The idea of wearing black had been spread via leaflets, which had been prepared, by a group of militant clergymen. These leaflets had then been distributed in Tehran and the provinces and had been popularly received by the people there. News of this move is now relayed to the world’s major news agencies by reporters who describe it as an “unprecedented event.” Meanwhile, protest marches and rallies are in evidence throughout the cities and villages of Iran including the capital, Tehran, and cries of “Death to the Shah” and ‘~Long live Khomeini” ring out in all parts of the country.

A ceremony hailing October 26 is held in the Shah’s presence, and Ja’ far Sharif Imami, the Prime Minister, announces: “This year, October 26 coincides with the full implementation of the policy to allow freedom of thought and speech.”(!) Similarly, during an address given at the ceremony in which various issues are discussed, the Shah states: “Certain mistakes have inevitably been made. A number of sound programmes have inevitably strayed from their intended path, and organisation has been lacking in certain affairs. But this is nevertheless something which can be corrected and remedied.” He then adds: “Certain mistakes have been made in the past, but the country must continue to survive. We firmly believe in freedom and support an open political climate; and indeed, freedom must prevail. As can be seen, the press now writes whatever it likes.” The Shah then admits to thousands of people being held in prisons, and says: “Thousands of those who were held in prisons have been released. We have already released and shall continue to release such prisoners whenever this is possible, and this open social climate will become Increasingly apparent to you as the days pass by.”(269)

The USA still hopes to keep the Shah in power by whatever means necessary, hence, in a message sent to the Shah to mark October 26, Carter expresses himself thus: “The present difficulties will blow over and thanks to the progressive political policy which His Royal Highness has had Implemented, the nation of Iran will arise as a powerful nation. Your Royal Highness, allow me to stress once more that the USA greatly values the firm and long-standing relationship it enjoys with Iran.”( 270)

Waiter Scheel, the West German President, and Hua Kuo-feng, the Chinese leader, also send congratulatory messages to the Shah on his birthday. Here, the reader needs to be reminded that Hua Kuo-feng is the very person who came to Tehran as an official guest of the Shah on September 8, 1978 (Shahrivar 1 7, 1 357 AHS), a day when thousands of people attained martyrdom at the hands of the regime’s agents both in Tehran and in the provinces. Needless to say, later, following the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Mr. Hua Kuo-feng sent a message to the government of the Islamic Republic In which he made an official apology for having visited Tehran and having been a guest of the Shah during those sombre and traumatic days!

As well as Carter and Hua Kuo-feng, others who also sent congratulatory messages to the Shah included Leonid Brezhnev, the USSR’s Head of State, and the leaders and presidents of Canada, Morocco, Malta, Syria, Indonesia, Holland, Bangladesh, Guinea, North Korea, South Africa, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Senegal, Bulgaria, Mauritius, West Germany, Tunisia, Oman, Vietnam, Albania, France, and several other countries. There can be no doubt that these declarations of support for the Shah served to delay the latter’s departure from Iran and to prolong the killings which he brought about In the country.

In a major speech delivered on October 26, 1978 by Imam Khomeini (may God grant him peace) from his place of residence in Neauphle-Ie-Chateau before an audience of students and Iranians resident abroad, reference is made to the Shah’s crimes, to the regime’s anti-Islamic propaganda campaigns, and to the tragic attack on the Friday Mosque in Kerman by mercenaries. In this speech, Imam also urges everyone, irrespective of their social class, to unite as one in order to continue in their struggle against the regime; and in declaring October 26 (the Shah’s birthday) a day of mourning, he stresses: “October 26 is a day of national mourning, and is the day from whence all of the miseries suffered by the oppressed nation of Iran initially sprung. The noble and oppressed people of Iran, and those fronts which have a love of Islam and the country, are to divest the enemy of their ability tothink straight, and must bring an end to their tyrannical rule as soon as possible.

IN THE NAME OF GOD, THE COMPASSIONATE, THE MERCIFUL

Today, on October 26 (Aban 4)( 271) , even Iran’s own radio service has spoken of demonstrations and disturbances taking place in many of the cities in iran; and according to reports, people in Qum, northern Tehran and certain other places have dressed in black clothing, black banners also being in evidence in some places( 272) There are different kinds of birthdays: one kind of birthday is something from which goodness springs, it is a source of blessings, it is something which leads to the oppressor being crushed and to the idol- and fire temples being destroyed. This is the kind of birthday, which pertains to the Holy Prophet. It has been said that the fire in the temple at Pars was extinguished and that the columns of Taq-i Kisra tumbled to the ground. History has spoken of this demolition and extirpation( 273) , but the point to bear in mind is that at that time two powerful forces were in existence:

One of them comprising the oppressive rulers of the day, and the other, the fire-worshipping clerical authorities, and because of the birth of the Holy Prophet, because he had been brought into this world, these two forces were eventually destroyed. The awe-inspiring columns of Taq-i Kisra, which served as a visible sign of these powerful forces, came tumbling down.

“Anushirvan the Just( 274) ” of whom some speak, is nothing but a myth! He was in fact a cruel tyrant of a man, but maybe he was called “just” in comparison to other kings, for otherwise how could he possibly b~ called “Anushirvan the Just?” It was because the Holy Prophet was born into this world that these columns of oppression collapsed. That is, the roots of oppression were eradicated and the flames of dualism, polytheism and fire-worship were extinguished because the Prophet came into the world

The foundations of both of the powerful forces, which prevailed at that time, were destroyed because of him. The following two basic principles then became widespread: via the Holy Prophet, monotheism grew world­wide, and, God willing, still continues to grow; and the essential purpose of prophethood was actually realised, for the real purpose of prophet hood is a prophet’s mission to wipe out the roots of power held by those in authority who treat the people unfairly.

Thus, the Prophet had come to wipe out these roots of oppression, to destroy these columns of oppression, which were so impressive, these palace columns which were erected through the hard toil of these poor people, through the torment suffered by these poor people, through the exploitation of these poor powerless people. And at the same time, since that which really matters is the spread of monotheism, the Prophet destroyed those places from where fire and beings other than God were worshipped, and he extinguished the fires therein.

However, quite the opposite results from the births of certain other people, and October 26 is a case in point. Of course, I must beg the Holy Prophet’s forgiveness for mentioning his birthday in conjunction with that of this despicable wretch (the Shah), but it is a case of wanting to compare light to darkness, of comparing a true human being to one who is inhuman. And it is this inauspicious birthday (of the Shah), which has led to the present state of affairs of which you are all aware. These two affairs concerning the signs of polytheism and oppression constituted the reason for the Holy Prophet’s coming and indeed both of these signs were eventually wiped out by him, but the situation with regard to them both was reversed with the birth of this person! That is to say, the birth of this person has led to a situation where both fire worshippers and the worship of fire have gained strength and have been promoted, and where the roots of oppression have become increasingly firm. And this is especially the case in our own country of Iran.

One side of the story in Iran concerns the fire worshippers who live in and around Yard, and who have been given so much encouragement and support( 275) , that according to the newspapers, these American fire Worshippers even wrote to the Shah thanking him and stating that no one else had hitherto supported and honored their faith to the extent that he had. It was God’s will that our people soon awoke. Even though they awoke after the event, they nevertheless awoke in time and were thus able to prevent this person from following his plans through. The American fire worshippers and the wealthy among them had intended to impose their will upon him (the Shah), or perhaps it was also a case of him being found willing, but whatever, there was more to this affair than that which I have mentioned. There was much more involved than the issues I have pointed to and indeed these issues were of a more delicate nature.

It all began when he helped to promote some of the fire temples and changed the calendar whereby time was reckoned according to Zoroastrian history rather than that of Islam. God knows that this act of betrayal by him towards Islam, and this affront to the Holy Prophet, God’s peace and blessings be upon him and his descendants, constitutes a crime of much more serious proportions than that of these killings which he has brought about. If we were to balance all these killings against this one deed which involved changing the official calendar of Islam, changing the symbol of monotheism, the symbol of humanity, into these things which relate to fire worshippers, into a fire worshippers’ calendar, a calendar for the Zoroastrians, then we would see that this crime outweighs all of the other crimes that he has committed against us. This person wanted to ruin Islam’s reputation and worth; he wanted to destroy the symbol of Islam.

He has sent our oil to them, taking it and giving it away to them. And yet these are things which matter in material terms only but which nevertheless clearly constitute a crime. Giving a country’s reserves away to foreigners constitutes a crime against a nation, but changing the calendar constitutes an affront to the reputation of Islam. And this is exactly what this person has done. Indeed, if it weren’t for that punch which the nation gave him in the mouth thus compelling him to bring back Islamic calendar and dispose with the Zoroastrian calendar, then this affair would have developed even further. Basically, they had intended to return things to the way they were before the Holy Prophet of Islam, to the time of those tyrannical kings, those vicious murderers, and they had intentions of behaving as the latter had done and of bringing about the same state of affairs that had existed at the time of these kings.

“Pan Iranianism( 276) ” is the belief that Iran must preserve its Iranian identity! But do the ancient kings mean everything to you? Are the ancient kings all that you can claim to have had in the past? Just look at what these kings did to the people. And the same goes for that group which comprised the Magi and others like them, just look at how they treated the people of Iran( 277) .

As for the other side of the story, this concerns how the Holy Prophet behaved towards his own people when he came and called on them to believe in monotheism, and even how he behaved towards those infidels who paid tribute to the Islamic state, those people who were against religion. Hazrat Amir (Imam ‘Ali), peace and blessings be upon him, once said that he had heard of an army of soldiers - apparently they had been Mu’ awiya’ s soldiers - arriving at a certain place and of them stealing, amongst other things, an anklet from the foot of a non-Muslim (dhimmi), from the foot of a woman who was either Jewish or Christian. Accounts describe how Hazrat Amir then said: “Even if one died of grief because of this incident, this would not be an overreaction( 278) .

This is the kind of person he was. This is the kind of ruler we seek. We seek the kind of regime whose ruler, whose king - indeed, it is impertinent of me to call Hazrat Amir “king” - whose ruler, whose leader, is like he who governed over a range of countries including the Hijaz, Iran, Egypt and so on; like he who showed concern for all of his subjects, including the person who was not of his own faith. On the very day that they swore allegiance to Hazrat Amir, accepting him as their sultan as it were, as their imam and caliph, once homage had been paid to him, he took up his pick and went to work, for he was someone who used to get things done himself, through his own toil. But why should he have done this - why did he dig the soil? Once he had in fact dug a well, someone came to him to congratulate him after which he replied: “It is the succeeding generations that you should congratulate.” He then asked that the indigent be brought to him and he endowed the place in question to them( 279) .

Yes, we seek a ruler like Hazrat Amir, who would sit and reckon the accounts of the public treasury in the light emitted from one lamp, from one paraffin lamp or oil lamp or whatever kind of lamp they used at that time. In fact, on one occasion Hazrat Amir was busy making such calculations when somebody called on him to discuss something which bore no relation to the work in which the hazrat was engaged at that moment. Imam ‘all therefore turned out the light saying: “Until this moment I was reckoning the accounts of the public treasury. This light is public property and I was using it to enable me to do work which relates to the people’s property, but now that you wish to speak to me about something else, something which bears no relation to the public treasury, why should we continue to use the people’s lamp( 280) ? Of course, no one can behave as Hazrat Amir did, no one in the world is capable of this, but the least we ask is that our ruler be someone who is not a thief! Now we have reached the stage where we will be content to have a ruler who at least does not steal to such an extent, a ruler who will not plunder the wealth of these people so, or oppress them in this way.

As I previously explained, the birth of the Most Noble Messenger, peace and blessings be upon him, led to the fires in the fire temples being extinguished, but on the contrary, besides his (the Shah’s) intention to relight the fires in such temples - fire temples which had once given occasion to oppression - according to what they say, he has actually given his approval and support to some of the fire temples which are located around Yazd. Furthermore, he changed the calendar and he had intended to continue with this line of action, putting such plans into effect one by one, that is, of course, until the nation came to the rescue and caused the columns of Kisra’ s Palace to tumble to the ground, although true enough, oppression is yet to be put down in this way.

Do you now see what he did to this nation? Do you see how he has oppressed and continues to oppress this nation? Yet, even at this late hour, now that his number is up and his efforts are in vain, he has come up with certain ideas! From what they say, the regime has sent a certain group of people to Kerman, people who are supposedly kolis, people whom they call “vagrants” - now whether the regime paid these people to go there or not I Do not know - but it is similar to what happened in the year when Fayziya Madrasa was stormed.

On that occasion I was present, I was in Qum when those SAVAK agents and those commandos posing as “peasants” charged into Fayziya Madrasa, setting fire to the Qur’an, setting fire to turbans, flinging people to their deaths from the roof. And all this was supposedly done because

The peasants no longer favoured the akhund’( 281) ! It was claimed that these peasants no longer desired to follow the Qur’ an, that they did not want the akhund! But is this really the case? Whenever the peasant is questioned as to what he desires, he replies that he desires both the Qur’an and Islam. Those commandos and the others who you (the Shah) trained in order to crush Islam, are they really our peasants? Yes indeed, I was present to witness events and to see what they (the regime) did on that occasion. They even came to my home at that time, but the harsh reaction I showed towards them prevented them from fulfilling their intentions.

The whole incident at Fayziya began during a gathering there. Certain speakers wished to speak at this gathering, and I had either already spoken or was due to speak when someone told me, and indeed I myself witnessed, that an uncalled for salawat had been chanted. I then instructed a friend to announce that should anyone attempt to cause trouble at the gathering, then I would ascend the pulpit in the courtyard of the holy shrine of Hazrat Ma’suma (pbuh) and would speak out to the people there. Those agents present were not the sort of people to persist with such behaviour knowing that it would bring about such consequences; and since they were at a loss as to what they should do, they left the gathering( 282) .

It was on that same day that they poured into Fayziya Madrasa and went wild; it was on that very same afternoon that they committed those outrages in Fayziya Madrasa( 283) On that particular day, it was in the guise of peasants that they ran riot and behaved so disgracefully, and now they have started to claim that it is the kolis who are doing whatever. The( 284) regime’s agents poured into the city of Kerman in the guise of kolis, and they have done the same elsewhere, in other cities, cities such as Hamadan where the people were so savagely attacked. It is said that the same has also happened in Zanjan. As for Qum, disturbances, shootings and killings have been going on for the past two or three days now, and the city has been in a state of unrest as have some parts of Tehran. Even today, I listened to a number of reports broadcast over Iranian radio, which named many different places where there is unrest and so on.

And so there we have the people’s celebration for October 26, the 4ay which commemorates his birthday! Black is being worn today. Yes, the radio mentioned one or two places - I think it was Maragheh or somewhere - where this and that had happened, and then the radio continued to give some account or other of events there. As for who did what, I Do not know how valid their accounts are or who was actually involved in these events, but having said that, the fact remains that many cities have been quoted over the radio even though the truth is without doubt something other than that which they have been reporting. There is certainly more to it than this, and news of what actually occurred during these events will no doubt reach you later.

Whilst two important events came to pass because of the Most Noble Messenger’s birth, those being: the end brought to polytheistic and fire-worshipping tendencies, and the collapse of the columns of oppression, now his (the Shah’s) birth has in fact served to rekindle fire-worshipping! If he had been given the chance he would have revived the principles of fire worshipping, for we already saw how he had changed the calendar, and had erected those towers of besetting oppression.

It is such towers of oppression, which give rise to these holocausts of fire. What exactly had those poor people who had gone to the cinema( 285) done to warrant the Chief of Police going and closing the doors (whilst the cinema was ablaze) and refusing to allow the people to open them? Of course it must be said that the cinema in Iran is not really a place which one should frequent This is one of the tragedies in Iran that the cinema’s there serve to corrupt and ruin our youth In spite of this tact certain, people had indeed gone to the cinema on this occasion but even so why should they have been treated in this way” Evidently certain incendiary devices had been planted there with the intention of creating a tire of burning those poor people alive, of turning them into ashes And the whole purpose was to make others out to be terrorists~ Surely though there was no need to go so far as to commit such a terrorist act yourselves and then to place the blame on other supposed terrorists But then these are the kind of people they are This is the kind of regime the Iranian people have to put up with They (the regime) committed that shameful act in Kerman, storming the mosque there suffocating a group of those present by means of certain gases, killing another group comprising men and women adults and children setting fire to everything in the mosque, in the people s place of worship, and then they invaded the bazaar looting it and setting it ablaze Yet now after all that they say that they intend to send some people to discover who actually committed such a deed! But who does he intend to send to make enquiries? Does he mean to send the same people that he sent to discover who had caused the incident in Abadan (i.e. the Rex Cinema tragedy)? Does “His Imperial Majesty” wish to punish the ruthless brutes who committed this act? He himself is that person! It is he who is the source of all the tyranny and misery suffered by the people.

If the people of Iran do not make a move and put an end to this soon, then there are many things, which he intends to do. This nation must be rescued. Everyone, wherever they may be, must help these people; otherwise, this man will destroy the very fabric of society. Now, having behaved so disgracefully in Kerman and having laid the blame on the kolis or whoever - no one being more of a koli than he (the Shah) himself - yes, now he has sent people to conduct a so-called public enquiry into who carried out such an act, who committed such an atrocious deed! But sir, the nation can no longer believe these things that you say.

From the very beginning of events in Abadan, the people of that city took to the streets of their own volition for they realised that they (the regime) were the ones who were responsible for this crime. They realised

Wanted to carry out this deed in such a smooth manner, if he had wanted to create a fire with such skill, to plant incendiary substances so effectively and then to close the cinema doors thus preventing anyone from leaving the cinema . . . there is no way that he could have achieved this. And this is why people began to make their voices heard (in protest), and why now, whenever such incidents occur, the people themselves are aware of who is to blame.

style='margin-left:9.0pt;tab-stops:405.0pt'>Again, anti-regime protests were widely held when the people went to visit the cemetery( 286) And this is how things now are in Kerman; how they are in Hamadan; how they are in Zanjan. Now he (the Shah) has recently made the decision to silence the people in this way. The people all know that these acts of oppression are all performed on his orders. There is no way that a member of the police would set people on fire unless he had been given leave to do so by him (the Shah). Do you really think they would dare to kill someone without his permission? - Without his instructions, without his strict instructions?

On Khurdad 15 (June 5), he himself was in command. From what they say he commanded the forces himself( 287) He who is in command in all of these different places is this very man. This man’s birth has been the source of all the sufferings of the people of Iran. May God remove this source of oppression (the audience cries Amen), may He cast this black flag to the ground (the audience cries Amen); and soon so, He shall, God willing. This is something, which is about to take place. This kind of frantic action that we now see is that of an animal whose head has been severed and who now wants to make a last desperate struggle.

Be that as it may, we are all duty-bound, all of us. Those of us here all have a duty to perform. Each one of you, if possible, must pass on written material about Iran to the newspapers here, to the journals here, to your fellow students and to the universities here. Pass on information about the situation in Iran. Tell the people about Iran. Even now, there may still be certain people who are not aware of what is really going on.

Is America right in saying that the people are upset because they have been given freedom, because they have been given too much freedom too quickly( 288) ? Have the Iranian people got indigestion because of the freedom that has been given to them? Has the nation raised its voice because it has been given too much freedom? Indeed, this is how Mr. Carter sees it! And the newspapers - either Kayhan or Ittila ‘at - have quoted him as saying that a quick democracy has been brought about, a sudden new-found freedom has been given, and that this is why the people are now opposing him (the Shah)! Is this really the case? Is it that he has granted freedom, and because of this the people still cry out: “We want freedom, we want freedom?” Are they crying out because of the independence and the “great civilisation” that they enjoy?

Again only today, this man (the Shah) was talking about how everyone could see for themselves how much freedom there is in Iran; how everyone could see the freedom, he had granted to this nation. Only today, October 26, did he say these things’( 289) I really can’t figure out what makes these people tick! I am astonished! God knows there is indeed call to be astonished, firstly, at the kind of people they are . . . and secondly, at the fear that has arisen amongst the Muslim people that, as the Shah puts it: “If it weren’t for me the communists would take over.( 290) ” The world would in fact come to an end! Without him (the Shah) there is no Iran! Indeed, Iran is Muhammad Riza! Without him, Iran would no longer exist! Thus, he argues that we Iranians wish to live in our own country, we wish to resolve our differences or whatever in our own country; but he says that if he were not there then there would no longer be an Iran!

Those young people who shout slogans such as these( 291) , slogans which are false and groundless, those people are presently assisting the regime. On the one hand they are assisting it by trying to make a group of people afraid of a possible communist takeover should the Shah leave -although in fact these kinds of remarks no longer frighten the people - and on the other hand, these very differences of opinion which exist between us and between the young people themselves, this dichotomy which is to be found amongst the young people, serves to assist this regime whereby those of you who are under the impression that you are helping to bring the Shah down, are in fact, paradoxically strengthening the bases of his oppression.

I regret the fact that these youngsters are assisting the regime in this way without even being aware of what they are doing. Those who ask you to chant these slogans are those who are actually allied to this very regime. These communists who belong to the officially recognised Tudeh Party, these leading communist figures, in actual fact serve his (the Shah’s) ~: regime( 292) and our children, our youngsters, will have been taken in if they go along with their game. The light of Islam still lies within these : youngsters but they have been deceived. They ought to break away from these criminals, from those who urge them to join their outfit. These people in fact want to save the Shah and you are unaware of this. It makes no difference whether they are inside the country or abroad.

Propaganda is being disseminated under various pretexts in order to save this person (the Shah). Whatever means possible are being resorted to so that this person can remain, and this affair (concerning the supposed threat of communism) is one such means. Wake up. These youngsters of ours are to pay close attention to what is currently going on for events, which are now unfolding are crucial. If what they say is true and one and a half thousand students have staged a pro-communist demonstration, then this itself is a sign of the defeat of communism in Iran. The very fact that a mere one and a half thousand people are standing in confrontation against a population of thirty million, all of whom have risen the banner (of Islam) and are crying out for the Qur’ an, is itself proof that these (communists) have suffered a defeat in Iran.

Hence, it is not the case that the communists would take over should he (the Shah) leave. If he should leave, not even a single communist would be found in Iran, for even if we suppose that instead of one and a half thousand people, five thousand people are now standing in confrontation against the rest of the population, these youngsters of ours in Qum alone could easily deal with them. There would be no need for those in Tehran to assist in any way, for our youngsters in Qum alone could put paid to these communists. What on earth are the communists capable of doing? They have tricked you. Everything that they say is mere rhetoric. They wish to use you to the Shah’s advantage. They have now exploited you; they have made fools of you.

Do not listen to what they have to say. Unite and cry out with one voice. Join the Muslims in their cries. If you were to cry out in unison, then it would be all over for him (the Shah). Do not sow discord. A house divided against itself cannot stand. Today, the presence of differences means suicide for the Muslims. Everyone must unite. Everyone must cry out in unison. Everyone must cry out for the same thing, they must all cry: “Death to this Shah and to this monarchy; death. To those who support him, such as Carter and others like him.” This is what we are crying out and this is what will make the people succeed. Do not be afraid of these things that they say and all this commotion that they make. Can a nation, which has risen up to make a legitimate claim, carry on living under oppression?

We all saw for ourselves how the martial law governments were unable to do anything about the situation. In Qum for example, isn’t martial law still in force there? Yet, for the past three or four days now, anti-regime slogans have rung out in the city. Clashes have broken out there. Unrest prevails. And what about the situation in Tehran, is that any different? No indeed, the situation there is the same as in Qum.

I beseech God, the Blessed and Exalted, to grant good health to all of those brethren both inside the country and abroad, who are making sacrifices for the sake of Islam. May the Lord grant you all success? May He grant you all good health? Everyone must make an effort to assist this nation, which has now risen up and is shedding its blood. Everyone must cooperate with this nation so that, God willing, it may succeed. Right now, in order for you who are abroad to cooperate, you must propagate the nation’s message. The people there in Iran are having to deal with commandos and those so-called “kolis” - who are in fact commandos also -and they are presently having to shed their blood, whereas those of you who are here, abroad, must help your fellow countryman in whatever way possible by means of propagation (those present chant a salawat).


SPEECH NUMBER
FORTY-SIX