![]() |
|
Date:December 31, 1971 (AD) I Dey 10,1350 ((AHS) /
Dhu al Qa’dah 1391 (AH)
Place:Shaykh
Ansari mosque Najaf, Iraq .
Theme: Iranians used as scapegoats by the Ba’athists .
Occasion: he Ba’athists refusal to allow Imam to migrate to
Lebanon.
Those present: Religious scholars, clergymen and several
Iranian residents of Iraq.
After Imam Khomeini (pbuh) threatened to leave Iraq, the Ba’ athist regime, for fear of its reputation, contrived to keep him from migrating. The continuing expulsion of Iranians under inhumane conditions and the arrest of several high-ranking religious men saddened and angered Imam. The late Ayatullah Hakim’s efforts in this regard were also unsuccessful against the Ba’ athist regime’s widespread propaganda created to incite nationalistic feelings in the Iraqi people.
In the middle of all this, Michel Aflaq - ideologue for the Ba’athist regime - came to Baghdad and put forth dangerous plans. He was responsible for hatching a plot to accuse the son of the late Hakim of spying for MuIIah Mustafa Barazani, and he conspired to assassinate religious personalities such as the late Shaykh Muhammad Shari’at, Imam’s representative in Pakistan.
Imam’s distress was not entirely due to the, restrictions imposed upon him by the Iraqi Ba’ athist regime. The Iranian regime, aware of the differences which existed between Imam and the Ba ‘athists, took action by means of informers and loyalists to poison public opinion against Imam and to torment Imam himself.
The dispute between Iran and Iraq concerned an agreement made in 1937, when Britain had total control over Iraq, which divided the Arvand river (Shatt al-Arab) between Iran and Iraq. The agreement was however, one hundred percent in Iraq’s favour, and Iran’s objection to the contents of the aforementioned agreement became a pretext for deporting Iranians from Iraq and laid the groundwork for destroying the Najaf theological centre.
Imam was living in Iraq as an opponent of the Iranian government, and the Ba’ athist regime hoped to make the most of this opportunity and use Imam’s presence against Iran. However, Imam was not one to subject him to other’s profiteering for politics or to sacrifice an oppressed nation for personal gain. Imam’s revolt against the Shah’s regime was a divine uprising and even though he was actually a prisoner of the Ba’ athist regime he was never prepared to speak out against Iranians for the sake of the political ploys of two cruel governments involved in destructive adversity, and he in fact stood in opposition to these inhumane actions of the Ba’ athist regime.
This was one dimension of the problem. The other concerned the events taking place within Iran, news of which vexed Imam Khomeini. The price of crude oil, for international reasons, went up, and correspondingly Iranian revenues rose and were spirited away by those connected to the regime. The Shah began to establish new anti-Islamic, anti-human programmers, especially in the year 1971 ( 1350 AHS), against the clergy. The establishment of a “Religious Corps” by order of the Shah was one of these programmers. As soon as Imam heard about it , he issued a proclamation on November 12, 1971 (Aban 2 1,1350 AHS) stating: “The tune of the Religious Corps is played at a time when the tyrannical regime is daily striking continuous blows at the body of Islam.... now it is up to the zealous Muslims and especially the enlightened youth to earnestly declare their aversion to this unrhythmical, destructive tune and to increasingly attend the mosques and religious gatherings and express their devotion to Islam, the great ‘ulama and the respected preachers (may their blessings continue) all the more, and through this expression, strike these imperialist agents (may God forsake them) in the mouth (468) .”
While the Iranian regime suppressed insurgent groups and imprisoned and tortured the clergy, it also continued with its anti-Islamic programmer. The most brazen plan brought forth was its sex education programmer for high-school students, a plan that was justified in articles published by the government-controlled press. The programmer was unsuccessful due to the strong opposition and objections of many of the clergy. However, the regime continued in other ways to disseminate Western culture and spread corruption.
The opening of mixed schools was part of a programmer which was gradually brought into effect ( 469) . Other actions included the establishment of the “Youth Palace”, a place where the regime’s un-Islamic and valueless objectives for young boys and girls were achieved; there were a few centers set up in Tehran and gradually branches were established in the provincial capitals and other large cities.
Another deplorable tragedy in Iran was brought about by police officers who viciously attacked students holding a protest gathering at Tehran University, and then at the Science and Industry University (previously known as Aryamehr) and Tehran Polytechnic on April 4, 1971 (Ordibihisht 10,1350 AHS) as university students there protested at the arrest of Tehran University students. In this incident, over 450 students were injured and arrested. Their slogans “Salutations Khomeini!” revealed the influence Imam’s speeches had on the students and their acceptance of his leadership.
The massacre of workers from the Jahan Cheet factory in Karaj as they held protest a rally was another depressing incident which saddened Imam ( 470) . Also at this time, Muslim students, resident in Europe, wrote letters to Imam seeking his guidance and Imam responded by requesting that they help to bring together the educated classes and the religious scholars.
The Mujahidin-i Khalq organization, which later revealed its true nature and became known to the Iranian people as the “Munafiqin,” (the Hypocrites)
Appeared to also espouse an Islamic ideology, though its members believed strongly in armed struggle. They decided to use Imam Khomeini’s spiritual and political influence, which was becoming more widespread daily among the educated and university students, in order to acquire financial benefits and to strengthen their organizational situation.
One of the combatant clergymen who was present in Najaf when some members of this group visited Imam there states: “Some of the original members of the Mujahidin - later known as the Munafiqin - visited Imam in Najaf to obtain his sanction of their principles and receive confirmation of their decision to embark on an armed struggle. Imam welcomed them with open arms and, over several visits, permitted them to put forth their opinions. Even though they had only brought two of their publications for him to study, through reading them and listening to their ideas Imam told them that now was not the time for an armed rebellion, and contrary to letters of authorisation which they had from some of the high-ranking ‘ulama, he refused to support their objectives and methods. After reading the book, “Rahe Anbia, Rahe Bashar” (The Way of the Prophets, the Way of Mankind), Imam realized that they did not believe in ma ‘ad (the day of resurrection). They believed in the evolutionary perfection of material in this world ( 471) .”
The tendency towards Marxism among members of this organization between 1973 and 1975 ( 1352- 1354 AHS) and their actions after the victory of the Islamic Revolution which were in complete co-ordination with the anti-revolutionary grouplets; their seeking refuge in America and Western countries; and their later co-operation with Saddam was a sign of the depth of Imam Khomeini’s insight ( 472) . When the Iranian regime saw Imam Khomeini’s obstinate stance regarding the Ba’ athist regime of Iraq, it decided to strike up a close relationship with him in order to achieve its own aims. The chief SAVAK representative in Iraq received orders to meet with Imam and inquire as to whether he was interested in returning to Iran or going on to Pakistan. However, because he was aware of Imam’s firm stance he wrote his report for the Iranian authorities without first speaking to Imam and in this he stated that Imam’s return to Iran would prove detrimental to the interests of the Shah’s regime.
Imam was very optinstic that the movement he had founded would end in victory, and the machinations against him proved to be ineffective. When the leader of the movement realized that Iraq opposed his proposed departure from that country he fearlessly made an emotional speech to a group of religious students and clergymen, and while he was aware of the presence of Iraqi spies and secret agents, he said: “Governments come and go, their life is very short.”
With regard to the oppressive Ba ‘ athist regime of Iraq which had suppressed the voice of the people in its prisons, even silencing the remonstrations of the late Ayatullah Hakim, the highest-ranking Shi’ i marja ’, by placing him under house arrest, Imam addressed the clergy of Najaf on the need to preserve their unity and for self-purification, and advised the Iranian people to provide for those driven from Iraq , stating: “. This government, which cannot really be called a government, has no power to resist nations and if they confront you and I, they cannot confront the nation if the Iranian clergy are expelled, the clergy from other countries must stand up and carry on with their religious duties...”
One can say that if this stirring speech had not been made, when the Iranian clergy had been expelled, the other religious students and clergy would have left also and the highly renowned theological centre at Najaf would have been deserted. This in fact was the ultimate aim of the Ba’ athist regime of Iraq, and possibly of the Iranian regime as well. However, Imam Khomeini encouraged the other religious students to stay at the centre and resist this inveterate plot of the Ba’ athist regime of Iraq thus rendering it fruitless.
|
|
During his time in Mecca before his migration to Medina, the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him and his descendants) was concerned only with propagating the word of God and acquainting the people with God the Exalted and with Islam. He had no assistant to help him combat the polytheists and spread Islam. Just as one sees in the Holy Qur’an, the suras which were revealed to him in Mecca concern the aspects of introducing Islam, preaching and guidance alone, there is no mention of disagreements or war and even the laws are spoken of less.
The ordinary man who looks only at the surface of things could not have predicted what benefits his migration from Mecca, under such unpleasant circumstances and having suffered a defeat, would hold for him. However, when he went to Medina, then the results of his migration became clear and he was able to spread the word of Islam and find followers there, eventually returning victoriously and successfully to Mecca in such a way that the elders of the Quraysh tribe were humbled .
Before him, and even though this was so, the Prophet set them free ( 473) . Now, even though a great many Iranians have become the scapegoats in the dispute between the governments ( 474) and have been turned out of this country under such tragic circumstances ( 475) , there may well he some great benefits to come from this action of which we are, as yet, unaware. May God the Blessed and Exalted return you all to this theological centre just as the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings he Upon him and his descendants) returned victoriously and triumphantly to Mecca, and may the day arrive when this theological centre becomes even stronger than it is now. I am sure that, eventually, the theological centre will return to its former state, and, God willing, if you act upon your religious and scientific duties, you too will return to Najaf.
The burden of knowledge is a heavy burden, which is upon your shoulders. Not only is it your responsibility to learn a handful of terms and their meanings, hut you have also been given the responsibility for preserving Islam and its precepts. You are the trustees of a divine revelation, and you must purify your souls while at the same time acquiring knowledge. In addition, as you propagate your knowledge to others, so too you must ameliorate your soul. Never fail to remember your obligations, be amicable and pleasant to one another, put aside your differences, and be to one another as brothers, and with a spirit of unity and purity work for Islam. You are all scholars, you are all the leaves of one tree and all from one root, and if you are faithful to your vow, God the Exalted shall he loyal to His vow and shall return you to the theological centre. God-willing we shall meet again here. If I reach the end of my days and am not here with you, you all shall be here and gather together once again.
In any event, this theological centre will not sink into decline; it will remain in its place. Irrespective of the spiritual and divine aspects, even according to the laws of nature the theological centers will not vanish because they are held in esteem by all Muslims, especially the Shi’a, and they have the support of the nation, and that which the nations support the government cannot oppose. Governments are transient, their lives short. The support for Najaf comes from great nations and because of this, it will be preserved. Now in our theological centre there are students from Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Iraq and other Arab nations all acquiring knowledge, and this government ( 476) , which certainly cannot he called a government, does not have the power to stand up to these nations, even though it may oppose you and I it cannot oppose the nation. If the Iranian .
Men are sent away, the others must remain and uphold their obligations to their religion. For you are like regiments of soldiers, if one regiment is attacked and defeated by the enemy, then another steps in to take its place and resolutely stands up to the enemy. It is the enemy’s wish that when one regiment is defeated the rest retreat leaving the battlefield deserted.
The gentlemen who are here from other countries must stand firm and continue with their studies and with the purification of their souls. In addition, if I, a student of religion, and the maraji’ leave, you must remain and continue with your duties. Of course, my leaving has reasons that maybe many of you are not aware of, but others must remain and not desert the fortress, for we have seen what can happen. The theological centre in Qum was destroyed - such destruction! A few who were always under pressure and harassed put up resistance and soon there came a turnabout:
The previous oppressor ( 477) was removed and the defeated centre of that era ( 478) became the six-thousand-strong theological centre of today. You have not been defeated. If you look at the history of the oppressors and those oppressed around the world, you will see that the oppressed are always victorious. Mu’awiya with all the power, wealth and greatness which he possessed was obliterated and today in Syria, the centre of his realm, there is not even a trace of his grave ( 479) .
The situation of these poor merchants who have stayed long years in Iraq and who have no friends, family, acquaintances, not even a single relation in Iran, is extremely sorrowful and it is my hope that the people of Iran will treat them well. They are guests and I expect the noble Muslim people of Iran to be kind to their guests and their brothers. Give them shelter, food and clothing. Help them to solve their problems and more importantly, familiarise them with the Iranian situation with which they are unfamiliar.
You gentlemen who leave for Iran, send my regards to our Iranian brothers, tell them that I personally request that they help these brothers who number approximately a hundred thousand and have been expelled from Iraq and scattered throughout Iran and that they show them kindness.